Oughta

Oughta is a Haskell library for testing programs that output text. The testing paradigm essentially combines golden testing with grep.

More precisely, Oughta provides a DSL to build recognizers (i.e., parsers that simply accept or reject an string). The inputs to Oughta are a string (usually, the output of the program under test) and a separate, generally quite short program written in the Oughta DSL.

The simplest DSL procedure is check, which checks that the output contains a string. For example, the following test would pass:

Program output:

Hello, world!

DSL program:

check "Hello"
check "world"

Oughta draws inspiration from LLVM's FileCheck and Rust's compiletest.

Example

Let's say that you have decided to write the first ever Haskell implementation of a POSIX shell, hsh. Here's how to test it with Oughta.

If the input to the program under test is a file format that supports comments, it is often convenient to embed Oughta DSL programs in the input itself. For example, here's a test for echo:

# check "Hello, world!"
echo 'Hello, world!'

Using this strategy, each test case is a single file. You can use the directory package to discover tests from a directory, and tasty{,-hunit} to run tests:

module Main (main) where

import Control.Monad (filterM, forM)
import Data.ByteString qualified as BS
import Oughta qualified
import System.Directory qualified as Dir
import Test.Tasty qualified as TT
import Test.Tasty.HUnit qualified as TTH

-- Code under test:
-- runScript :: ByteString -> (ByteString, ByteString)
-- Returns (stdout, stderr)
import Hsh (runScript)

test :: FilePath -> IO ()
test sh = do
  content <- BS.readFile sh
  (stdout, _stderr) <- runScript content
  let comment = "# "  -- shell script start-of-line comment
  let prog = Oughta.fromLineComments sh comment content
  Oughta.check' prog (Oughta.Output stdout)

main :: IO ()
main = do
  let dir = "test-data/"
  entries <- map (dir </>) <$> Dir.listDirectory dir
  files <- filterM Dir.doesFileExist entries
  let shs = List.filter ((== ".sh") . FilePath.takeExtension) files
  let mkTest path = TTH.testCase path (test path)
  let tests = map mkTest shs
  TT.defaultMain (TT.testGroup "hsh tests" tests)

Now you can just toss .sh scripts into test-data/ and have them picked up as tests.

What if you wanted to test both stdout and stderr? You can use two different styles of comments:

test :: FilePath -> IO ()
test sh = do
  -- snip --
  let stdoutComment = "# STDOUT: "
  let prog = Oughta.fromLineComments sh stdoutComment content
  Oughta.check' prog (Oughta.Output stdout)

  let stderrComment = "# STDERR: "
  let prog' = Oughta.fromLineComments sh stderrComment content
  Oughta.check' prog' (Oughta.Output stderr)

Test cases would then look like so:

# STDOUT: check "Hello, stdout!"
echo 'Hello, stdout!'
# STDERR: check "Hello, stderr!"
echo 'Hello, stderr!' 1>&2

Cookbook

This section demonstrates how to accomplish common tasks with the Oughta DSL. The DSL is just Lua, extended with an API for easy parsing.

Writing tests in Lua offers considerable flexibility and expressive power. However, with great power comes with great responsibility. Tests should be as simple as possible, and some repetition should be accepted for the sake of readability. It is often appropriate to just make a sequence of API calls with literal strings as arguments.

Oughta is used to test itself. See the test suite for additional examples.

Long matches

Match large blocks of text with Lua's multi-line string syntax:

some
multi-line
    text

check [[
some
multi-line
    text
]]

Repetition

Match repetitive text using a variable:

HAL: Affirmative, Dave. I read you.
Dave: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

name="Dave"
check("Affirmative, " .. name)
check("I'm sorry, " .. name)

or with a for-loop:

Step 1: Learn about Oughta
Step 2: Use it to test your project
Step 3: Enjoy!

for i=1,3 do
  check("Step %d".format(i))
end

Checking for generated text

To check that some dynamically-generated text appears elsewhere in the output, use the string library and the text variable:

Generating a random number...
Generated 37106428!
Printing 37106428...

check "Generated "
num=string.find(text, "^%d+")
check(string.format("Printing %d...", num))

The above example borders on too much logic for a test case. Use discretion when writing tests!

API reference

The Lua API is stateful. It keeps track of a global variable text that is initialized to the output of the program under test. Various API functions cause the API to seek forward in text. This is analogous to working file-like objects in languages like C or Python. text should not be updated from Lua code; such updates will be ignored by Oughta.

High-level API

Checking functions:

• check(s: String): Find s in text. Seek to after the end of s. Like LLVM FileCheck's CHECK.
• checkln(s: String): checkln(s) is equivalent to check(s .. "\n").
• here(s: String): Check that text beings with s. Seek to after the end of s.
• hereln(String): hereln(s) is equivalent to here(s .. "\n").

Other utilities:

• col() -> Int: Get the current line number of text in the output.
• file() -> String: Get the file name of the test case.
• line() -> Int: Get the current line number of text in the output.
• src_line(n: Int) -> Int: Get the line number of the Lua code at stack level n.

Low-level API

• fail(): Fail to match at this point in text.
• match(n: Integer): Consume n bytes of text, treating them as a match.
• seek(n: Integer): Seek forward n bytes in text.

Motivation

The overall Oughta paradigm is a form of data driven testing. See that blog post for considerable motivation and discussion.

In comparison to golden testing, Oughta-style tests are coarser. They only check particular parts of the program's output. This can cause less churn in the test suite when the program output changes in ways that are not relevant to the properties being tested. The fineness of golden testing can force devlopers to adopt complex workarounds, these can sometimes be obviated by Oughta-style testing.

However, it is more complex. For example, it requires learning the Oughta DSL. It can also cause unexpected successes, e.g., if the program output contains the pattern being checked, but not in the proper place.

Why build a Haskell library when LLVM already provides their FileCheck tool? There are a variety of reasons:

1. Ease of adoption: external runtime test dependencies are painful
2. Speed: use as a library avoids file I/O, spawning shells, etc.
3. Flexibility: FileCheck can be used on tools without command-line interfaces

Versioning policy

Oughta conforms to the Haskell Package Versioning Policy. Both the Lua and Haskell APIs are considered to be part of the public interface.