Safe Haskell | None |
---|---|
Language | Haskell2010 |
Provides the heuristics for when it's beneficial to lambda lift bindings.
Most significantly, this employs a cost model to estimate impact on heap
allocations, by looking at an STG expression's Skeleton
.
Synopsis
- data Skeleton
- data BinderInfo
- = BindsClosure !Id !Bool
- | BoringBinder !Id
- binderInfoBndr :: BinderInfo -> Id
- type LlStgBinding = GenStgBinding 'LiftLams
- type LlStgExpr = GenStgExpr 'LiftLams
- type LlStgRhs = GenStgRhs 'LiftLams
- type LlStgAlt = GenStgAlt 'LiftLams
- tagSkeletonTopBind :: CgStgBinding -> LlStgBinding
- goodToLift :: DynFlags -> TopLevelFlag -> RecFlag -> (DIdSet -> DIdSet) -> [(BinderInfo, LlStgRhs)] -> Skeleton -> Maybe DIdSet
- closureGrowth :: (DIdSet -> DIdSet) -> (Id -> Int) -> IdSet -> DIdSet -> Skeleton -> IntWithInf
When to lift
The analysis proceeds in two steps:
- It tags the syntax tree with analysis information in the form of
BinderInfo
at each binder andSkeleton
s at each let-binding bytagSkeletonTopBind
and friends. - The resulting syntax tree is treated by the StgLiftLams.Transformation
module, calling out to
goodToLift
to decide if a binding is worthwhile to lift.goodToLift
consults argument occurrence information inBinderInfo
and estimatesclosureGrowth
, for which it needs theSkeleton
.
So the annotations from tagSkeletonTopBind
ultimately fuel goodToLift
,
which employs a number of heuristics to identify and exclude lambda lifting
opportunities deemed non-beneficial:
- Top-level bindings
- can't be lifted.
- Thunks
- and data constructors shouldn't be lifted in order not to destroy sharing.
- Argument occurrences
- of binders prohibit them to be lifted.
Doing the lift would re-introduce the very allocation at call sites that
we tried to get rid off in the first place. We capture analysis
information in
BinderInfo
. Note that we also consider a nullary application as argument occurrence, because it would turn into an n-ary partial application created by a generic apply function. This occurs in CPS-heavy code like the CS benchmark. - Join points
- should not be lifted, simply because there's no reduction in allocation to be had.
- Abstracting over join points
- destroys join points, because they end up as arguments to the lifted function.
- Abstracting over known local functions
- turns a known call into an unknown
call (e.g. some
stg_ap_*
), which is generally slower. Can be turned off with-fstg-lift-lams-known
. - Calling convention
- Don't lift when the resulting function would have a
higher arity than available argument registers for the calling convention.
Can be influenced with
-fstg-lift-(non)rec-args(-any)
. - Closure growth
- introduced when former free variables have to be available at call sites may actually lead to an increase in overall allocations resulting from a lift. Estimating closure growth is described in StgLiftLams.Analysis and is what most of this module is ultimately concerned with.
There's a wiki page with some more background and history.
Estimating closure growth
We estimate closure growth by abstracting the syntax tree into a Skeleton
,
capturing only syntactic details relevant to closureGrowth
, such as
ClosureSk
, representing closure allocation.RhsSk
, representing a RHS of a binding and how many times it's called by an appropriateDmdShell
.AltSk
,BothSk
andNilSk
for choice, sequence and empty element.
This abstraction is mostly so that the main analysis function closureGrowth
can stay simple and focused. Also, skeletons tend to be much smaller than
the syntax tree they abstract, so it makes sense to construct them once and
and operate on them instead of the actual syntax tree.
A more detailed treatment of computing closure growth, including examples, can be found in the paper referenced from the wiki page.
AST annotation
Captures details of the syntax tree relevant to the cost model, such as closures, multi-shot lambdas and case expressions.
data BinderInfo Source #
The type used in binder positions in GenStgExpr
s.
BindsClosure !Id !Bool | Let(-no-escape)-bound thing with a flag indicating whether it occurs as an argument or in a nullary application (see StgLiftLams.Analysis). |
BoringBinder !Id | Every other kind of binder |
Instances
OutputableBndr BinderInfo Source # | |
Defined in StgLiftLams.Analysis pprBndr :: BindingSite -> BinderInfo -> SDoc Source # pprPrefixOcc :: BinderInfo -> SDoc Source # pprInfixOcc :: BinderInfo -> SDoc Source # bndrIsJoin_maybe :: BinderInfo -> Maybe Int Source # | |
Outputable BinderInfo Source # | |
Defined in StgLiftLams.Analysis |
binderInfoBndr :: BinderInfo -> Id Source #
Gets the bound Id
out a BinderInfo
.
type LlStgBinding = GenStgBinding 'LiftLams Source #
type LlStgExpr = GenStgExpr 'LiftLams Source #
tagSkeletonTopBind :: CgStgBinding -> LlStgBinding Source #
Tags every binder with its BinderInfo
and let bindings with their
Skeleton
s.
Lifting decision
:: DynFlags | |
-> TopLevelFlag | |
-> RecFlag | |
-> (DIdSet -> DIdSet) | An expander function, turning |
-> [(BinderInfo, LlStgRhs)] | |
-> Skeleton | |
-> Maybe DIdSet |
|
Combines several heuristics to decide whether to lambda-lift a given
let
-binding to top-level. See StgLiftLams.Analysis for details.
:: (DIdSet -> DIdSet) | Expands outer free ids that were lifted to their free vars |
-> (Id -> Int) | Computes the closure footprint of an identifier |
-> IdSet | Binding group for which lifting is to be decided |
-> DIdSet | Free vars of the whole binding group prior to lifting it. These must be available at call sites if we decide to lift the binding group. |
-> Skeleton | Abstraction of the scope of the function |
-> IntWithInf | Closure growth. |
closureGrowth expander sizer f fvs
computes the closure growth in words
as a result of lifting f
to top-level. If there was any growing closure
under a multi-shot lambda, the result will be infinity
.
Also see StgLiftLams.Analysis.