Safe Haskell | Safe |
---|---|
Language | Haskell2010 |
Synopsis
- class Functor w => Comonad (w :: * -> *) where
- wfix :: Comonad w => w (w a -> a) -> a
- cfix :: Comonad w => (w a -> a) -> w a
- kfix :: ComonadApply w => w (w a -> a) -> w a
- (=>=) :: Comonad w => (w a -> b) -> (w b -> c) -> w a -> c
- (=<=) :: Comonad w => (w b -> c) -> (w a -> b) -> w a -> c
- (<<=) :: Comonad w => (w a -> b) -> w a -> w b
- (=>>) :: Comonad w => w a -> (w a -> b) -> w b
- class Comonad w => ComonadApply (w :: * -> *) where
- (<@@>) :: ComonadApply w => w a -> w (a -> b) -> w b
- liftW2 :: ComonadApply w => (a -> b -> c) -> w a -> w b -> w c
- liftW3 :: ComonadApply w => (a -> b -> c -> d) -> w a -> w b -> w c -> w d
- newtype Cokleisli (w :: k -> *) (a :: k) b :: forall k. (k -> *) -> k -> * -> * = Cokleisli {
- runCokleisli :: w a -> b
Comonad
class Functor w => Comonad (w :: * -> *) where #
There are two ways to define a comonad:
I. Provide definitions for extract
and extend
satisfying these laws:
extend
extract
=id
extract
.extend
f = fextend
f .extend
g =extend
(f .extend
g)
In this case, you may simply set fmap
= liftW
.
These laws are directly analogous to the laws for monads and perhaps can be made clearer by viewing them as laws stating that Cokleisli composition must be associative, and has extract for a unit:
f=>=
extract
= fextract
=>=
f = f (f=>=
g)=>=
h = f=>=
(g=>=
h)
II. Alternately, you may choose to provide definitions for fmap
,
extract
, and duplicate
satisfying these laws:
extract
.duplicate
=id
fmap
extract
.duplicate
=id
duplicate
.duplicate
=fmap
duplicate
.duplicate
In this case you may not rely on the ability to define fmap
in
terms of liftW
.
You may of course, choose to define both duplicate
and extend
.
In that case you must also satisfy these laws:
extend
f =fmap
f .duplicate
duplicate
=extend
idfmap
f =extend
(f .extract
)
These are the default definitions of extend
and duplicate
and
the definition of liftW
respectively.
Instances
kfix :: ComonadApply w => w (w a -> a) -> w a #
Comonadic fixed point à la Kenneth Foner:
This is the evaluate
function from his "Getting a Quick Fix on Comonads" talk.
(=>=) :: Comonad w => (w a -> b) -> (w b -> c) -> w a -> c infixr 1 #
Left-to-right Cokleisli
composition
(=<=) :: Comonad w => (w b -> c) -> (w a -> b) -> w a -> c infixr 1 #
Right-to-left Cokleisli
composition
ComonadApply
class Comonad w => ComonadApply (w :: * -> *) where #
ComonadApply
is to Comonad
like Applicative
is to Monad
.
Mathematically, it is a strong lax symmetric semi-monoidal comonad on the
category Hask
of Haskell types. That it to say that w
is a strong lax
symmetric semi-monoidal functor on Hask, where both extract
and duplicate
are
symmetric monoidal natural transformations.
Laws:
(.
)<$>
u<@>
v<@>
w = u<@>
(v<@>
w)extract
(p<@>
q) =extract
p (extract
q)duplicate
(p<@>
q) = (<@>
)<$>
duplicate
p<@>
duplicate
q
If our type is both a ComonadApply
and Applicative
we further require
(<*>
) = (<@>
)
Finally, if you choose to define (<@
) and (@>
), the results of your
definitions should match the following laws:
a@>
b =const
id
<$>
a<@>
b a<@
b =const
<$>
a<@>
b
Instances
ComonadApply Identity | |
ComonadApply NonEmpty | |
ComonadApply Tree | |
ComonadApply Log | |
Semigroup m => ComonadApply ((,) m) | |
ComonadApply f => ComonadApply (Cofree f) | |
Monoid s => ComonadApply (ReifiedGetter s) | |
Defined in Control.Lens.Reified (<@>) :: ReifiedGetter s (a -> b) -> ReifiedGetter s a -> ReifiedGetter s b # (@>) :: ReifiedGetter s a -> ReifiedGetter s b -> ReifiedGetter s b # (<@) :: ReifiedGetter s a -> ReifiedGetter s b -> ReifiedGetter s a # | |
ComonadApply w => ComonadApply (IdentityT w) | |
(ComonadApply f, ComonadApply g) => ComonadApply (Day f g) | |
Monoid m => ComonadApply ((->) m :: * -> *) | |
(a ~ b, Conjoined p) => ComonadApply (Bazaar p a b) | |
(a ~ b, Conjoined p) => ComonadApply (Bazaar1 p a b) | |
(a ~ b, Conjoined p) => ComonadApply (BazaarT p g a b) | |
(a ~ b, Conjoined p) => ComonadApply (BazaarT1 p g a b) | |
(<@@>) :: ComonadApply w => w a -> w (a -> b) -> w b infixl 4 #
A variant of <@>
with the arguments reversed.
liftW2 :: ComonadApply w => (a -> b -> c) -> w a -> w b -> w c #
Lift a binary function into a Comonad
with zipping
liftW3 :: ComonadApply w => (a -> b -> c -> d) -> w a -> w b -> w c -> w d #
Lift a ternary function into a Comonad
with zipping
Newtypes
newtype Cokleisli (w :: k -> *) (a :: k) b :: forall k. (k -> *) -> k -> * -> * #
Cokleisli | |
|